How the fuck can you, with your alleged expertise, even start thinking that calculations would be done client-side? If you have that so-called expertise, you should know that calculating stuff client-side is so fucking easy to tamper with. I'm not ignoring any software or hardware limitations. Assuming the opposite is again, just so fucking stupid. Why the fuck don't you assume I mean 100 people that are experts in the field. It would come down to a question of the labor in question, their wages, how fast they would get a job done, etc etc. Obviously 25 highly skilled people would be better than 100 not-so-skilled people. Again, you probably didn't notice any of that because you were too busy behaving like a child.Īnd arguments like 25 specialized bla bla vs 100 bla bla, what the FUCK are you even talking about? How does that remotely relate to what I'm saying? Again, you argue like a kid. I just said that it wasn't all that stupid of an idea. I never claimed screenshots was a fix-it-all solution. Instead of talking shit, either say you disagree, or as now, bring up valid points/oppinions. Do you understand how incredibly hard it is to take anything you say serious? You debate like a fucking imbecil. More like 100 from Denmark alone if not more.Īll you've been saying for 4-5 posts now is "you're dumb af", "you're braindead", etc. There are a few options which would work a hundred if not thousand times better which doesn't involve any AI at all but as previously mentioned it wouldn't take long before it would be deemed useless as well.Īnd do you actually think there are only 100 competent cheat coders? LMAO. Do you even realize how much strain all this AI bs talk would be on the consumer's computer? And what the average spec's are for the computers playing CSGO? I'd give it a month tops before all the shitty public cheats would be able to tackle an AI using screenshots to detect cheaters.Īn AI would never (usable with current consumer tech) be able differentiate between a semi rage hacker and a 3000+ elo turk playing on central/north European servers. You found a way to legitimize a claim in your head where 100 developers are somehow faster, better and more efficient than lets say 25 specialized coders. You ignore all software and hardware limitation of both seller and consumer. (Bachelor here + previous 9 years experience with cheat scene) It's obvious you have little to no idea about software development. I don't give a fuck if only 5% more cheaters get caught by capturing screenshots, that's 5% less people ruining the game for others. Anything is better than that, and no idea is too stupid to implement. I read somewhere that Valve had 10 people working on CS:GO, or some crazy low number like that. There's literally hundreds of ideas you could throw into VAC, and make it MUCH better than it is right now. Develop AI to detect non-human movement, teach it how certain movements repeated over and over again, kick them without sending it to Overwatch. But why can't it be one of many parts of their software? Why not do something, "because it's easy to circumvent" ? Let it catch all the people using shitty cheats. And that you even draw that conclusion is so stupid that I'm losing braincells. I'm not saying VAC should just be a system that takes screenshots. I'm not really sure if you're too stupid to understand, or too stupid to read, but nomatter what, the conclusion is the same you're not really able to understand what's being said here.Įither you throw a lot of money at huge VAC improvements, or you let the cheaters win. Yeah, hire 100 experienced, expensive anticheat software developers, and have them all create something to take screenshots of peoples screen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |